Skip to content

    Success Stories

    Real cases, real results. Read how we've helped individuals and businesses fight back against defamation. Names and details changed for confidentiality.

    OnlineHealthcare£75,000 + Apologies

    Viral Twitter Campaign Against NHS Consultant

    The Situation

    A senior NHS consultant was targeted by a coordinated campaign of false allegations on Twitter/X, claiming malpractice and patient neglect. The posts accumulated over 50,000 views and were shared by several accounts with large followings.

    Our Strategy

    We applied for a Norwich Pharmacal order to identify the anonymous accounts, submitted emergency platform takedown requests, and issued pre-action letters to the identified individuals.

    The Outcome

    All defamatory content was removed within 5 days. Two individuals were identified and settled, providing formal apologies and paying substantial damages. The consultant's GMC record remained unblemished.

    "I thought my career was over. The team at Defamation Guard acted with incredible speed and professionalism. Within a week, the nightmare was over."

    Dr. A.R.

    NHS Consultant

    CorporateTechnologySix-figure settlement

    Competitor Smear Campaign Against Tech Startup

    The Situation

    A SaaS startup discovered that a competitor had been posting fake reviews on G2 and Capterra, and had created anonymous LinkedIn accounts to spread false claims about data security vulnerabilities.

    Our Strategy

    We gathered forensic evidence linking the accounts to the competitor's employees, issued preservation requests to platforms, and sent a comprehensive pre-action letter threatening proceedings for both defamation and malicious falsehood.

    The Outcome

    The competitor settled within 28 days, agreeing to remove all fake content, issue internal compliance training, and pay a substantial six-figure settlement to cover damages and costs.

    "The fake reviews were costing us enterprise deals. Defamation Guard understood the tech industry and knew exactly how to build the case."

    CTO, Tech Company

    SaaS Startup

    IndividualPersonal£35,000 + Injunction

    False Accusations by Ex-Partner on Social Media

    The Situation

    A private individual was subjected to a sustained campaign of false allegations by a former partner across Facebook, Instagram, and in messages sent to the individual's employer and family members.

    Our Strategy

    We obtained an interim injunction within 48 hours prohibiting further publication. We then pursued a full defamation claim alongside a harassment claim under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

    The Outcome

    The court granted a permanent injunction. Damages of £35,000 were awarded, with a costs order against the defendant. A restraining order was also put in place.

    "They made my life hell for months. The injunction stopped everything overnight. I finally feel safe again."

    Sarah K.

    Private Individual

    ProfessionalEducation£15,000 + Apology

    False Safeguarding Allegations Against Teacher

    The Situation

    A secondary school teacher was falsely accused of inappropriate conduct by a parent who disagreed with a disciplinary decision. The parent posted the allegations on local Facebook groups and reported them to the school and local authority.

    Our Strategy

    We coordinated with the school's legal team, submitted platform takedown requests, and issued a pre-action letter to the parent setting out the defamatory nature of the posts and the clear evidence of falsity.

    The Outcome

    The parent removed all posts, issued a written apology, and paid £15,000 in damages. The safeguarding investigation was closed with no case to answer.

    "As a teacher, your reputation is everything. Without Defamation Guard, I might have lost my career over something that never happened."

    David M.

    Secondary School Teacher

    CorporateFinance£120,000 + Corrections

    Trade Publication Publishes False Financial Claims

    The Situation

    A financial services firm was the subject of articles in two trade publications alleging regulatory breaches and client fund mismanagement. The articles were based on information provided by a disgruntled former employee.

    Our Strategy

    We issued pre-action letters to both publications and the former employee. We presented comprehensive evidence including FCA compliance records and audited accounts demonstrating the complete falsity of the claims.

    The Outcome

    Both publications issued front-page corrections and apologies. The former employee provided undertakings and paid substantial damages. The firm's FCA relationship was unaffected.

    "In financial services, trust is everything. The false articles could have triggered an FCA investigation and client exodus. The team's rapid response saved our business."

    Managing Director

    Financial Services Firm

    OnlineHospitality£25,000 + Reviews Removed

    Fake Google Reviews Destroying Restaurant Business

    The Situation

    A restaurant owner noticed a sudden surge of 1-star Google reviews, all posted within a few days, containing false claims about food hygiene, pests, and illness. The reviews were traced to a competitor opening nearby.

    Our Strategy

    We gathered IP evidence, submitted detailed reports to Google, and issued a pre-action letter to the competitor with forensic evidence linking the fake reviews to their business.

    The Outcome

    Google removed 14 fake reviews. The competitor settled out of court, paying damages and agreeing to a permanent undertaking not to post or commission fake reviews.

    "We went from 4.8 stars to 3.2 overnight. Defamation Guard proved who was behind it and got every fake review removed."

    Elena P.

    Restaurant Owner

    ProfessionalLegal£45,000 + Full Removal

    Solicitor Facing Anonymous Blog Attacks

    The Situation

    A practising solicitor discovered an anonymous blog dedicated to making false allegations about their professional conduct, competence, and personal life. The blog appeared prominently in Google search results for their name.

    Our Strategy

    We obtained a Norwich Pharmacal order against the hosting provider to identify the blogger, simultaneously applied for Google de-indexing, and prepared defamation proceedings.

    The Outcome

    The blogger was identified as a former opposing litigant. The blog was taken down, Google de-indexed all cached pages, and the individual paid £45,000 in damages plus costs.

    "Every potential client was seeing that blog when they Googled my name. The team identified the person behind it and shut it down completely."

    Solicitor (name withheld)

    Legal Professional

    IndividualPersonal£12,000 + Retraction

    Neighbourhood Dispute Escalates to Online Defamation

    The Situation

    A homeowner was subjected to a prolonged campaign by a neighbour who posted false allegations on Nextdoor, local Facebook groups, and sent letters to other residents claiming criminal behaviour.

    Our Strategy

    We documented the full course of conduct, applied for a harassment injunction, and pursued a parallel defamation claim for the published false statements.

    The Outcome

    The court granted an injunction. The neighbour was ordered to pay £12,000 in damages, publish a retraction on all platforms, and was warned that any breach would result in contempt proceedings.

    "Living next door to someone who was spreading lies about me was unbearable. The legal action put a stop to it permanently."

    Robert T.

    Homeowner

    OnlineTechnologyInjunction + Criminal Referral

    Deepfake Video Used to Damage CEO's Reputation

    The Situation

    A CEO discovered a deepfake video circulating on social media that appeared to show them making racist remarks. The video was shared thousands of times and picked up by industry commentators.

    Our Strategy

    We immediately applied for an emergency interim injunction. We engaged a digital forensics expert to prove the video was fabricated and submitted emergency takedown requests to all major platforms.

    The Outcome

    The injunction was granted within 24 hours. The video was removed from all major platforms within 72 hours. The source was identified through digital forensics and is now subject to criminal proceedings.

    "Seeing a fake video of yourself saying things you never said is terrifying. The speed of the legal response was the only thing that prevented catastrophic damage."

    CEO (anonymous)

    Technology Executive

    CorporateE-commerce£85,000 + Listings Restored

    Amazon Seller Hit by Coordinated Fake Reviews

    The Situation

    An established Amazon seller noticed a sudden flood of fake 1-star reviews on their best-selling products, accompanied by false safety complaints to Amazon's Brand Registry. Sales dropped 60% within two weeks.

    Our Strategy

    We submitted comprehensive evidence packages to Amazon's legal team, engaged digital forensics to trace the reviews to a competitor's network, and issued pre-action letters threatening proceedings for malicious falsehood.

    The Outcome

    Amazon removed all fake reviews and reinstated the suppressed listings. The competitor settled, paying damages and providing permanent undertakings. Sales recovered within 30 days.

    "We were losing £10,000 a week in sales. Defamation Guard understood exactly how Amazon works and got our listings restored faster than we thought possible."

    Amazon Seller

    E-commerce Business

    * All case studies are anonymised. Names and identifying details have been changed to protect client confidentiality. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Each case is assessed on its individual merits.

    What We Do vs. DIY vs. Other Firms

    See why clients choose a specialist defamation firm over general solicitors or handling it themselves.

    CapabilityDefamation GuardGeneric SolicitorDIY
    Avg. resolution time2–6 weeks3–12 monthsUnknown
    Platform takedown success rate94%~50%~20%
    Emergency injunctions (24hr)
    No-win, no-fee options
    Forensic identification of anon. accounts
    Saved vs. full litigation costUp to 80%VariesN/A
    Industry-specific expertise
    Free initial consultationvaries

    Could Your Case Be Our Next Success Story?

    If you're facing defamation, we're ready to help. Request a free, confidential case evaluation today.